Activity Type | Relation | Activity value | Units | Action Type | Journal | PubMed Id | doi | Assay Aladdin ID |
---|
ID: ALA3351134
Max Phase: Preclinical
Molecular Formula: C14H17F2NO6S
Molecular Weight: 365.35
Molecule Type: Small molecule
Associated Items:
ID: ALA3351134
Max Phase: Preclinical
Molecular Formula: C14H17F2NO6S
Molecular Weight: 365.35
Molecule Type: Small molecule
Associated Items:
Canonical SMILES: O=C(CS[C@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O)Nc1ccc(F)cc1F
Standard InChI: InChI=1S/C14H17F2NO6S/c15-6-1-2-8(7(16)3-6)17-10(19)5-24-14-13(22)12(21)11(20)9(4-18)23-14/h1-3,9,11-14,18,20-22H,4-5H2,(H,17,19)/t9-,11-,12+,13-,14-/m1/s1
Standard InChI Key: PVOLLIHSZFMLNI-RGCYKPLRSA-N
Activity Type | Relation | Activity value | Units | Action Type | Journal | PubMed Id | doi | Assay Aladdin ID |
---|
Activity Type | Relation | Activity value | Units | Action Type | Journal | PubMed Id | doi | Assay Aladdin ID |
---|
Natural Product: No | Oral: No | Chemical Probe: No | Parenteral: No |
Molecule Type: Small molecule | Topical: No | First In Class: No | Black Box: No |
Chirality: No | Availability: No | Prodrug: No |
MESH ID | MESH Heading | EFO IDs | EFO Terms | Max Phase for Indication | References |
---|
Mechanism of Action | Action Type | target ID | Target Name | Target Type | Target Organism | Binding Site Name | References |
---|
Molecular Weight: 365.35 | Molecular Weight (Monoisotopic): 365.0745 | AlogP: -0.56 | #Rotatable Bonds: 5 |
Polar Surface Area: 119.25 | Molecular Species: NEUTRAL | HBA: 7 | HBD: 5 |
#RO5 Violations: 0 | HBA (Lipinski): 7 | HBD (Lipinski): 5 | #RO5 Violations (Lipinski): 0 |
CX Acidic pKa: 11.70 | CX Basic pKa: | CX LogP: -0.69 | CX LogD: -0.69 |
Aromatic Rings: 1 | Heavy Atoms: 24 | QED Weighted: 0.47 | Np Likeness Score: -0.64 |
1. Pastor M, Cruciani G, Clementi S.. (1997) Smart region definition: a new way to improve the predictive ability and interpretability of three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships., 40 (10): [PMID:9154968] [10.1021/jm9608016] |
2. Pan D, Liu J, Senese C, Hopfinger AJ, Tseng Y.. (2004) Characterization of a ligand-receptor binding event using receptor-dependent four-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis., 47 (12): [PMID:15163189] [10.1021/jm030586a] |
3. Pastor M, Cruciani G, Watson KA.. (1997) A strategy for the incorporation of water molecules present in a ligand binding site into a three-dimensional quantitative structure--activity relationship analysis., 40 (25): [PMID:9406599] [10.1021/jm970273d] |
4. Gohlke H, Klebe G.. (2002) DrugScore meets CoMFA: adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) or how to tailor knowledge-based pair-potentials to a particular protein., 45 (19): [PMID:12213058] [10.1021/jm020808p] |
5. Uddin R, Saeed M, Ul-Haq Z. (2013) Molecular docking- and genetic algorithm-based approaches to produce robust 3D-QSAR models, [10.1007/s00044-013-0812-0] |
Source(1):